Download PDFContents
The Social Issues Informative Guide Project: A Concrete Application of Invitational Rhetoric
Why Invitational Rhetoric for Technical Communication Pedagogy?
Core Principles of Invitational Technical Communication Pedagogy
Implications: How Invitational Rhetoric Addresses Systemic Exclusion in Technical Communication
Considerations, Challenges, and Honest Limitations
Appendix A: Social Issues Informative Guide Project Overview
The Social Issues Informative Guide Project: A Concrete Application of Invitational Rhetoric
Before examining the theoretical foundations of invitational rhetoric in depth, it is essential to ground this work in practice. The Social Issues Informative Guide Project offers some concrete, immediately implementable way for technical communication instructors to enact invitational principles in their classrooms. This project serves as both the motivation for this paper's theoretical arguments and the practical culmination of invitational rhetoric principles. By foregrounding the project, we establish that invitational rhetoric is not merely aspirational but teachable and learnable.
Here is how the project works: In this collaborative endeavor spanning multiple weeks, students work together to collectively choose a contemporary social issue and identify the specific discourse community most impacted by that issue. Contemporary social issues might include homelessness, healthcare access disparities, immigration policies, disability rights, environmental justice, food insecurity, incarceration and criminal justice, gun violence, student debt, or other issues of systemic inequity. After educating themselves about the issue and community through research and ideally through direct outreach and listening, students co-create an informative guide suited to that discourse community. The guide highlights customized solutions, resources, and next steps developed in direct dialogue with community members themselves, not imposed from external expertise.
The project operationalizes invitational rhetoric by rejecting extractive approaches to marginalized communities. Rather than researching groups affected by issues like homelessness as "service objects" to be studied and written about, an invitational approach conceptualizes working-class individuals, undocumented migrants, unhoused people, disabled individuals, and other marginalized populations as equals whose priorities must foreground technical communication efforts. This reframes the student role from external expert to collaborator and listener. Thus, the guide production process emphasizes listening, dialogue, and centering community knowledge such that format, content, recommendations, and even the communication strategies employed emerge collaboratively (Foss & Griffin, 1995). This conscious attention combats problematic power dynamics by validating oppressed groups' agency, insights, and self-articulated aspirations—promoting social dignity rather than perpetuating further marginalization or reinforcing deficit narratives.
This project facilitates development of key ethical competencies for technical communicators, including participating inclusively in civic issues; understanding concrete impacts of communication choices on marginalized groups; taking responsibility to mitigate harm through rhetorical awareness, cultural humility, and conscious advocacy against injustice. By centering this project early and giving it substantial space, the paper establishes that invitational rhetoric is not an abstract concept but a practical, learnable pedagogy with immediate, real-world classroom applications. For the complete project description, including objectives, key guidelines, and outcomes please see Appendix A: Social Issues Informative Guide Project Overview.