• Contact

    Xchanges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Technical Communication, Rhetoric, and Writing Across the Curriculum.
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Staff
  • Resources
  • Submissions
  • CFP
  • Contact

"Student Perceptions of Writing Instruction: Twitter as a Tool for Pedagogical Growth"

Download PDF Download PDF

About the Authors

Sarah Lonelodge is a PhD candidate in the Rhetoric and Writing Studies program at Oklahoma State University. She also serves as an assistant director of the first-year composition program and as president of OSU’s chapter of the Rhetoric Society of America. Her research interests include composition pedagogy and religious rhetoric.

Katie Rieger is a PhD candidate at Oklahoma State University in the Rhetoric and Writing Studies program and is an Assistant Professor of English at Benedictine College. Her research interests include student-centered pedagogy; educational technology for distance learning; writing center studies; and the intersection of intercultural communication and technical writing pedagogy.

Contents

Introduction and Literature Review

Research Design and Methodology

Participants and Ethical Considerations

Data Collection

Data Analysis

Findings/Discussion

Pedagogical Implications

Conclusion

Works Cited

Research Design and Methodology

Designing this study as an analysis of tweets was a conscious and careful decision that best fit the purpose of the research as Twitter is often used as a way to publicly post thoughts and is available to anyone. Two notes about this claim should be noted. Firstly, Twitter does allow tweets to be private, if a user selects those privacy settings. Secondly, many scholars suggest that researchers still be extra sensitive and consider ethical implications when collecting social media (Fiesler & Proferes, 2018; Hibbin, Samuel, & Derrick, 2018; McKee & Porter, 2008; Zimmer, 2010). These ethical considerations will be explored in the following section.

In order to fully and fairly investigate the research questions, we employed grounded theory because it offers a blueprint for the systematic analysis of large amounts of data, as we describe in later sections. Louis Cohen, Lawrence Manion, and Keith Morrison (2011) argue that grounded theory allows the theory to emerge from the data as a consequence of systematic data collection and analysis rather than a set of predefined categories to be tested. Rather than, for example, searching tweets for themes in student surveys, grounded theory allowed us to consider the full meaning of each tweet and preserve student voices. Our goal was not to place these tweets within our current concepts of student perspectives but to consider that students may have more to say.

Pages: 1· 2· 3· 4· 5· 6· 7· 8· 9

Posted by xcheditor on May 17, 2021 in article, Issue 15.1

Related posts

  • Welcome to Issue 15.1 of Xchanges!
  • “The Shrine of Chino Mine: Extraction Rhetoric and Public Memory in Southern New Mexico”
  • "Mimetics as Digital Culture"
  • "Editor’s Introduction: Rhetoric and Composition Graduate Students Define Their Identities Against Dominant Narratives"
  • "On the Front Lines: Graduate Student Roles in Shaping Discourse in Digital Spaces"
  • "Subterranean Fire: The Percolating Currents of Graduate Labor Activism in Rhetoric and Composition"
  • "Mental Health in a Disabling Landscape: Forging Networks of Care in Graduate School"
  • "(Re)Producing (E)Motions: Motherhood, Academic Spaces, and Neoliberal Times"
  • "Doing it Herself: Cultivating a Feminist Ecological Ethos as a Female Graduate Student"
  • "Emerging through Critical Race Theory Counter-storytelling in a Rhetoric and Composition Graduate Studies Context"
  • "Unease with a Face of Certainty: A Personal Rhetorical History of My Imposter Syndrome"

© by Xchanges • ISSN: 1558-6456 • Powered by B2Evolution

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.