• Contact

    Xchanges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Technical Communication, Rhetoric, and Writing Across the Curriculum.
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Staff
  • Resources
  • Submissions
  • CFP
  • Contact

The Importance of Language Use in the Discussion of POC and Minority Groups in the Biological Sciences

by Kay Hernández | Xchanges 17.2, Fall 2022


Download PDF Download PDF

 

Contents

Introduction

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion

References

About the Author

Methods

To understand how presupposition and assertion use has changed over time, this paper examines 30 scientific research articles from the 1970s to 2021, sampling at 2-year intervals across 10-year sections (i.e., 1970-1972, 1980-1982… ). Originally, the focus of the search was on the ecological and environmental sciences related to anthropological contexts, but was expanded to the generalized biological sciences in order to build a sufficient corpus. Some main subgenres explored in these sciences include: ecology and environmental sciences, such as population dynamics, environmental justice, and sustainability, and medical sciences, such as pathology, genetics, and epidemiology. In order to further focus my corpus, I selected articles pertaining to ethnic groups, people of color, and minority groups. Notably, each decade appeared to feature different keyword choices in order to find relevant articles (see Table 1). Searching for texts before the 90’s required more drastic change in keyword selection, such as searching for “indigenous” and “native” referring to flora and fauna, rather than people.

Decade

Key Words

1970

Race, racial groups

1980

Ethnic groups, ethnics

1990

Ethnic, racial, minority groups, POC

2000

Environmental justice, indigenous, native populations, POC, minorities

2010

Environmental justice, indigenous, native populations, POC, ethnic minorities

2020

Environmental justice, indigenous, native populations, POC, ethnic minorities

Table 1: Keyword Usage Over Decadal Sampling


Analysis

My analysis involved sorting through each article and identifying attitude markers in the presuppositions and assertions of the article’s summary/abstract, introduction and background, as well as the results discussion. I composed an Excel spreadsheet in order to physically count the instances of each; this also acted as an annotated resource for developing the discussion.

  

Pages: 1· 2· 3· 4· 5· 6· 7

Posted by xcheditor on Dec 27, 2022 in Issue 17.1/2

Related posts

  • Editor's Note
  • Stories We Hear, Stories We Tell, and Stories We Live: Teaching Narrative in the Technical Communication Classroom
  • Examining the Effectiveness of a Peer Writing Coaching Model
  • Analysis of Communication of Animal Welfare and Animal Rights in Aquariums

© by Xchanges • ISSN: 1558-6456 • Powered by B2Evolution

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.