• Contact

    Xchanges: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Technical Communication, Rhetoric, and Writing Across the Curriculum.
  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Staff
  • Resources
  • Submissions
  • CFP
  • Contact

Redistributing Care Work: Toward Labor Justice for Graduate Student Instructors

by Olivia Rowland | Xchanges 19.1, Spring 2025


Download PDF Download PDF

 

Contents

Introduction

Teaching Writing as Care Work

Care Work and GSI Labor

Redistributing Care Work Pedagogically

Conclusion: Communities of Care

References

About the Author

Conclusion: Communities of Care

I have argued for pedagogical revisions that redistribute care work in the classroom as one way of redressing the large share of undervalued, underpaid, and emotionally taxing care work that GSIs perform. These teaching practices, however, form a necessary but not sufficient component of labor justice for GSIs. If we truly want to move away from viewing “first-year composition as the site of maternal-ethical student care” (Ritter, 2012, p. 413), we will need structural change. At the very least, writing programs must seriously reassess policies that compel an excessive amount of care work from GSIs, including but not limited to requiring frequent and copious feedback on student writing, additional administrative work like repeatedly inputting student data and participating in program assessment (O’Donnell, 2019; Robinson, 2021), and the unpaid peer mentoring often involved in pedagogical training. Although some of the pedagogical changes I have advocated for cannot be standardized, given that they require collaboration between instructors and students (currie & Hubrig, 2022, p. 144), WPAs can give GSIs the freedom to experiment. In the end, reduced care work will only result in labor justice for GSIs when paired with fair compensation, a change we must also advocate for at the institutional level.

While we struggle toward that goal, pedagogies that redistribute care work have the benefit of creating “communities of care” (Day et al., 2021, p. 390). Drawing on disability justice and trauma-informed frameworks, the concept of community care “prioritizes collective care and wellbeing” (currie & Hubrig, 2022, p. 133) and “privileges people over institutions” (Day et al., 2021, p. 390). Rather than viewing care as unidirectional, flowing only from teachers to students, communities of care proliferate reciprocal care for both students and teachers (Day et al., 2021). This model of care can also lessen the intensified extraction of care work from multiply marginalized GSIs, as caring becomes everyone’s responsibility. Although I do not yet think I can call my classroom a genuine community of care, I am hopeful that my students will take on some of the care work that makes our class happen. Communities of care can not only forward labor justice for GSIs, but support all of us in living through the multiple, overlapping crises of contemporary capitalism as we advocate for a better university.

Pages: 1· 2· 3· 4· 5· 6· 7

Posted by chanakya_das on Mar 25, 2025 in Issue 19.1

Related posts

  • Academic Leadership by Day, Student by Night: Juggling Department Management, Teaching, and a PhD Program as a Minority Woman
  • Empathy for the Instructor: A Reflection of Using Empathy-Based Pedagogy as a Graduate Teaching Assistant
  • Reclaiming Authority in the FYC Classroom as a Graduate Teaching Assistant: Using Feminist Pedagogies to Empower
  • Reflections on Collaborative Writing
  • Editor's Note
  • Editor's Note
  • Chat(GPT)-ing about the Affordances Generative AI Tools Offer for ADHD Writers
  • Experienced Teachers, Emergent Researchers: Graduate Students Developing Scholarly Identities
  • Local Assessment Design and Graduate Student Wellbeing
  • Precarity and Negotiations of Racialized Identities of Two POC Grad Instructors in a PWI
  • Tactically Transgressive Teaching: Dis/Empowerment as Graduate Student-Instructors

© by Xchanges • ISSN: 1558-6456 • Powered by B2Evolution

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.