• Contact

  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Staff
  • Resources
  • Submissions
  • CFP
  • Contact

Digital Interference: Challenges in Teaching Multimodal Projects in First-Year Composition

by Greg Gillespie | Xchanges 19.1, Spring 2025


Download PDF Download PDF

Contents

Introduction

Complicating Multimodality

Trouble with Training and Professional Development (PD)

Self-Reliance

Institutional Barriers

Recommendations

Conclusion

References

About the Author

Self-Reliance

Going beyond my department and institution, I pivot back to my own peer and personal networks for PD. The majority of pedagogical strategies I use when teaching multimodal writing come from chatting with my cohort friends or seeing what other instructors are doing on social media. While brainstorming ways to engage Composition II students more with their archival research projects, I designed an assignment where they put together a website exhibition to share their work with friends and family. I applied the knowledge from my past career to draft a website template so my students could go in to edit and put their own spin on it. In my personal life, I have always written in a journal and recognize the cognitive value of physically writing in notebooks. This semester I purchased small notebooks for my students to enact Commonplace Books, a way for them to intellectually interact with texts by recording quotes, ideas, and any other information, including sketches, comics, magazine clippings, and photos. I try to gain perspective from how multiple modes can impact a student’s experience in FYC. As always, I spoke transparently about my strategies and informed the students that this Commonplace Book activity may be a total flop, but experimenting with our ways of writing is worth the risks.

As Chen’s (2021) national survey informs us, most instructors rely on their own training efforts and personal networks to teach multimodal composition, with 10% reporting that they receive training from their institutions. This poses a serious question about the ways which English and Writing and Rhetoric departments respond to what is going on in the field. They are codifying it into the curriculum without providing ongoing development opportunities that are accessible to all instructors, including GTAs. The reliance on personal support networks requires extra labor and assumes that individuals have access to some expertise.

Pages: 1· 2· 3· 4· 5· 6· 7· 8· 9

Posted by nicole_oconnell on Apr 17, 2025 in Issue 19.1

Related posts

  • Editor's Note
  • Chat(GPT)-ing about the Affordances Generative AI Tools Offer for ADHD Writers
  • Experienced Teachers, Emergent Researchers: Graduate Students Developing Scholarly Identities
  • Local Assessment Design and Graduate Student Wellbeing
  • Precarity and Negotiations of Racialized Identities of Two POC Grad Instructors in a PWI
  • Redistributing Care Work: Toward Labor Justice for Graduate Student Instructors
  • Tactically Transgressive Teaching: Dis/Empowerment as Graduate Student-Instructors
  • Teaching Boldly, Teaching Queerly: Embracing Radical (Un)Growth and Possibilities as a Graduate Instructor in First-Year Writing
  • The TPC Contact Zone: Preparing Graduate Student Instructors for Students’ Writing Realities
  • Identity Narrative Assignment: How Writing About Students’ Identities Shapes Their Writerly Voice
  • Learning to Lean into Discomfort

© by Xchanges • ISSN: 1558-6456 • Powered by B2Evolution

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.