• Contact

  • Home
  • Archives
  • About
  • Staff
  • Resources
  • Submissions
  • CFP
  • Contact

"Embracing Digital Literacies: A Study of First-Year Students’ Digital Compositions"

 


About the Author

Bay VanWagenen graduated from California State University, Sacramento in 2013 with a Master's degree in English Composition. She currently teaches in the Merritt Writing Program at the University of California, Merced. Her research interests include genre studies, digital literacies, and first-year composition.

Contents

Introduction

Methodology Part 1

Students' Knowledge of Audience

Picturing an Audience

Managing an Audience

Managing an Audience (cont.)

Students' Knowledge of Genre

Facebook Genre Content

Blogging Genre Conventions

Blogging Genre Conventions (cont.)

Students' Knowledge of Purpose

Students' Knowlegde of Purpose (cont.)

Conclusion: Embracing Digital Literacies

Works Cited

 

Conclusion: Embracing Digital Literacies

Through listening to students discuss their digital writing practices, I have learned more about the thoughtful and often complex interactions and thought processes students undergo as they publish writings online. These students have shown how digital writing not only involves typing and publishing words on a screen, but also incorporates a host of other aspects such as timing, the use of strategic tagging, choosing the proper medium, utilizing images, and reposting or reusing other’s words in creative ways. Students are also thinking of the life span of their digital compositions – who might see this post years from now and think differently of me because of it? Beaufort’s five part schema allows the digital writings of students to be viewed in terms of writing expertise. Participants’ knowledge of audience, genre, and purpose help them to connect and engage online audiences and to achieve their personal writing goals.

Beaufort (2007) reminds “teachers, administrators, and researchers” to “look at the whole picture – the five knowledge domains in writing expertise – not one part or two when trying to help writers or to assess them” (147). While this study precluded two of Beaufort’s domains, writing process knowledge and subject matter knowledge, the study aims to provide a beginning look at the important things students are already thinking and writing about and the three knowledge domains that are most apparent in the scope of this study. Through analyzing digital compositions of students in this way, teachers can better understand how to bridge self-sponsored and school literacies for students. Digital writing necessitates “sophisticated skills of understanding concrete rhetorical situations, analyzing audiences (and their goals and inclinations), and constructing concise, information-laden texts, as a part of a dynamic, unfolding, social process” (Johnson-Eilola & Selber, 2009, p. 18). Understanding students’ daily navigation of such complex writing situations can only serve to strengthen composition classrooms and provide a foundation where students can practice and gain an increased ability to apply these writing strategies to new writing situations.

 

Pages: 1· 2· 3· 4· 5· 6· 7· 8· 9· 10· 11· 12· 13· 14

Posted by xcheditor on May 20, 2021 in article, Issue 10.2/11.1

Related posts

  • Welcome to Issue 10.2 and 11.1 of Xchanges!
  • "The Ethics and Legality of Financial Regulation: What Enron Revealed"
  • "Digital Invention: A Repository of Online Resources for College Composition Instruction"
  • "The Ethics of Visual Rhetoric & Photo Manipulation"

© by Xchanges • ISSN: 1558-6456 • Powered by B2Evolution

Cookies are required to enable core site functionality.